August 05, 2003A Letter To NaviguesserFirst off, let me say that I loved your letter and the spirit behind it. You said a lot of what needs to be said, and did so in a good and forthright way. If you will consider Jack Black instead of Jim Beam, I have a bottle here that will await your return home. The only area where we disagree at all is on the embedded reporters. The experience was not smooth in many cases, and there were some idiots in the group. The kick is, however, that what you saw was just one part of a different battle, one that has been raging since the late 50s. It was also a masterstroke on the part of top command authority, in that it was a beautiful bit of hearts and mind via the balls/crotch. Much of the problem with the media that you so well describe comes from the fact that most who are attracted to the media have a particular mindset. That mindset is to make the world a better place, but it is also a mindset that loves direct intervention. The idea that people should do things for themselves is very foreign to this mindset. Instead, it is always the government who should do things, as people make mistakes, people are dishonest, people that do bad things. What this particular mindset sees is a monolithic entity that does things to people, on behalf of groups of people, said groups being entities instead of individuals. They fail to realize, or accept, that in America the government is supposed to be the people, the individuals. They see it as the thing that keeps individuals from doing what they think are bad things. This particular viewpoint tends to be very far to the left, to put it mildly. For worse, The Media have been selecting for this mindset for some time, and those who go to it are not only drawn in, but promoted and rewarded. This, in turn, tends to cause an even greater concentration in not merely the newsroom, but the leadership boards as well. It is rare to see anyone who truly doesn’t share this mindset make it far in the newsroom. One of the other facets of this form of groupthink is that it has a distrust of portions of the government, in particular the military. The military is seen as old fashioned, reactionary, resistant to “progress” as they define it, and – horrors of horrors – the military actually does things instead of talking about them. The military is prepared to and does kill enemies, rather than simply talking to them and trying to change their minds. This results in the members of the military being viewed as, at best, dangerous Neanderthals. The mindset these people have, therefore, is the worst of the Victorian mindset so eloquently described by Kipling. For whatever comfort it may be worth, police, fire, and rescue also share in this taint and are treated accordingly. Now a peculiar thing about this group, however, is that they are also drawn to the ideals of journalism. Those ideals hold that truth matters, that there is such a thing as objective truth and it needs to get out. This does cause quite a contradiction within the mindset, one that often requires large doses of justification and rationalization, but it is there and this is important. I have written earlier about an undeclared war between members of The Media and the military. It is a bitter, hard fought, and nasty war and while I think that The Media has not covered itself in glory on this, there is indeed fault on both sides. What truly matters, though, is the additional bulwark that has been established within the mindset of The Media as a result. It holds that not only is the military bad, but anyone who has anything to do with them or understands them in any way, is bad as well. Bad as in evil, nasty, and beyond redemption. A Neanderthal troglodyte of the worst order, only slightly less so than the average soldier is in this viewpoint. My own career in mainstream journalism came to a crashing halt because of this, because you see I not only took ROTC, I had wanted to join the military. Worse yet, I left the path prescribed by the Journalism Purity League, also known as the white, er, Jouralism Citizens Council, to go to the evil realm of public relations and business development. Not only did I desert THE WAY for mere money (about three times the salary of a reporter at the time) but I did so for the U.S. Air Force. You see, I went to work as a contract employee at an Air Force testing and research center. For that, I was cast out and given the “you’ll never work in this town again” speech from several in the journalism field, including some I thought friends. At least reasonable acquaintances. Bad enough I was infected by greed, but I was also tainted irredeemably by the military. This was a few years ago, to be polite, but during that time I have seen some changes. More than that, I have seen the very window of opportunity that was seized at the start of this war. That is, the inbred desire for “the truth” and to go after the truth that has become part and parcel of modern journalism. That, you see, is what is being used against The Media right now. The embeds are, in all practical terms, a fifth column. The beauty of it is, they are not a direct threat nor are they full of lies and propaganda. Instead, they are infected with the truth, and I think that scares the hell out of a lot of the extremists in The Media. These are the people who have paid lip service to the ideals of journalism, including truth in reporting and coverage, and have concentrated instead on indoctrination and recruitment. Right now, you are seeing in the media a war within the ranks, as the extremists try desperately to kill the virus that is invading them. The problem is, for them, that it is awfully hard to kill the truth. Complicating that is the fact that the reporters who did have the courage and integrity to go and be with troops have gained great stock with the public. The American public, as Patton pointed out, loves a fight and loves a winner. The embeds were winners in the eyes of the public, and their enemies know and detest that fact. Because of this public perception and liking, they dare not move against the embeds too openly. They have and will continue to do so, but they have to be discrete, careful, and all the things that allow the awful truth memes to spread. While there were several embeds who did not give a fig about the truth, there were a lot more out there who believe in the ideals of journalism, who found out that their preconceptions were wrong, and who have the integrity to admit it. This is not making a direct impact at the top levels yet, but time will change that. Public opinion and public economic voting will change that. We will change that, you and me and everyone else who makes the choice. Many of the embeds have come back and are questioning the conventional wisdom of the newsrooms and the leaders of The Media. Many of the embeds are working their experiences, their perceptions, and their new knowledge into their reporting. Why do you think the news is so shrill on quagmire and such? Why do you think that things are so out of hand? The old guard is desperate to vindicate themselves, to do what they can while they can because the just don’t think their hold is slipping, they see it slipping. They see a new generation of reporters who are not violently anti-military. They see the public starting to call them on their biases, lies, and worse. They see power slipping from their grasp and they are desperate. Therefore, you see a hell of a lot of piss poor reporting and coverage from people who DO know better. And, you are starting to see some good reporting filter its way into the bottom of the media food change. Hearts and mind campaigns are slow things, even when you have them by the balls/crotch. It takes time to change minds, to shape the future. It is something we have seen many times. Just take a look at the aftermath of the American Revolution, and the problems with Crown Loyalists and with assimilating them into the Great Experiment. Take a look at Reconstruction after the War Between The States, Germany and Russia after WWI, Germany after WWII with the Werewolves and Odessa, and, what the hey, pick any war. You want to know the best things? First, the time on reconstruction is getting shorter each time, both because the worst excesses of carpet bagging have been eliminated and we are getting better at spreading the memes. Take a look at the emergent merchant and entrepreneur classes in Iraq itself if you want a good example. They are there, even if most non-blogging public in the U.S. doesn’t know it. Second, we have just set a few dozen to a few hundred reporters who have seen the truth and now know (and are infected by) the truth in newsrooms around the world, but particularly in the U.S. If they hold to the ideals, to what they were taught in journalism school, they will have no choice but to begin making changes, questioning authority, and doing all those wonderful hippie freak things against the mean old status quo in the field. The irony in that is positively delightful and I, for one, intend to enjoy every frelling moment of it. Third, these new troops are not alone. They are being supported by the blogs, the electro-mobile battalions of heavy artillery who fire truth memes, reminders, and more into both the great unwashed masses of the public and into the bastions of The Media. The fortifications of traditional gatekeeping and newsroom hierarchy are going to be about as useful in protecting the status quo as the Maginot Line was in keeping France free from Germans. They have been subverted and surrounded, and the artillery of real news and real journalism are going in against positions that have no overhead cover. The results are going to be about the same as it would be in real life. It is not a done deal, and like real life things are going to get worse before they get better. The pockets of resistance are going to get more desperate with each passing day, and lash out accordingly. Just as what is to come in Iraq, take heart despite the loss that each attack will bring, because it shows the desperation and is the sign that better things are to come. There are changes afoot in journalism and The Media. It is now up to each of us to encourage those changes, and to do what we can to make this a better place. "Send More Embeds!" -30- Posted by wolf1 at August 5, 2003 04:07 AM | TrackBackComments Hrmmm... Wolf? If you're correct about this [and I suspect you are - nicely reasoned], then we can expect to see a more and more virulent backlash against the non-traditional sources such as blogs & forums from traditional media. Similar to O'reilley's rant on the internet "attacking him"... I suspect that more and more of the beseiged sources like the NY Times will jump on the "Something needs to be done about the internet!" attack. Noteably, something must be done by the Gov. [Completely oblivious to the contradiction inherent in bashing the fed while crying to it as daddy to make us "stop hitting them!" ;)] The anarchistic nature of the 'net suddenly poses a threat now that major bloggers are getting media recognition, and blogging sources are starting to get more and more pointed with critique backed with fact checking their ingrained assumptions of superiority. Major threat - the peasants are thinking, and we're not buying the drivel, and we're infecting others with our skepticism. Speaking as someone who's been wedded to the anarchistic nature of the 'Net for a long time as a gunslinger, should make an interesting war. As Kang said: "It will be *Glorious!*" Messy though. ;) Posted by: Ironbear at August 5, 2003 05:44 AMHrmmm... Wolf? If you're correct about this [and I suspect you are - nicely reasoned], then we can expect to see a more and more virulent backlash against the non-traditional sources such as blogs & forums from traditional media. Similar to O'reilley's rant on the internet "attacking him"... I suspect that more and more of the beseiged sources like the NY Times will jump on the "Something needs to be done about the internet!" attack. Noteably, something must be done by the Gov. [Completely oblivious to the contradiction inherent in bashing the fed while crying to it as daddy to make us "stop hitting them!" ;)] The anarchistic nature of the 'net suddenly poses a threat now that major bloggers are getting media recognition, and blogging sources are starting to get more and more pointed with critique backed with fact checking their ingrained assumptions of superiority. Major threat - the peasants are thinking, and we're not buying the drivel, and we're infecting others with our skepticism. Speaking as someone who's been wedded to the anarchistic nature of the 'Net for a long time as a gunslinger, should make an interesting war. As Kang said: "It will be *Glorious!*" Messy though. ;) Posted by: Ironbear at August 5, 2003 05:45 AMNot sure why that doubled on me. Kill the first posting of it, if you please. Thanks. Posted by: Ironbear at August 5, 2003 05:46 AMAll valid points, Wolf. The embeds themselves were ok in my book. A lot of talent taking a lot of risks. My beef is with the air-conditioned newsrooms back home, taking the first word they hear and blasting it out on the airwaves without even pausing to get their acts (and stories) together. I didn't deploy until right before the hostilities ended, owing to a broken arm that made me unable to function in my MOS. They're not going to send you flying with a wing in a cast. While I was home, I stayed glued to the news, waiting for my turn to go to work in the Box. While I waited, I saw many, many stories that were blown far out of context and proportion based on choppy, incomplete information. All the embeds were reporting in with slices of information, and nobody in the rear had the patience to 1) look at the big picture, or 2) wait for more information instead of setting their hair on fire and crying, "The Sky is Falling, The Sky is Falling", playing up to the cameras for that shot at a pulitzer. What a bunch of hacks and whores. If you're going to tell our story, don't spin it, don't deconstruct it, just report events as things happen. Posted by: Naviguesser at August 5, 2003 08:46 AMGet ON, Naviguesser! Although I concur Wolf's analysis, I hear you 5-by, too! Bring us Reporting: This happened. "GI Stubs Toe" Spare us On-the-Spot Editorializing: Which means that American troops are bogged down in a quagmire of Vietnamese proportions, longing to return home, hating every sweaty moment of their enforced duty in a land filled with people who hate their very presence, surrounded by Iraqis whose love of God is visible in every holy gesture, every subtle word, and this compares badly to the vile, American thug GIs who steal from those they cannot rape, and kill all who- (We pause in this liberal link-down to bring you a few words from our sponsor, ANSWER: ....) [No you don't. We're changing channels! CLICK!] Posted by: Eye Opener at August 5, 2003 10:02 AM"All the embeds were reporting in with slices of information, and nobody in the rear had the patience to 1) look at the big picture, or 2) wait for more information instead of setting their hair on fire and crying, "The Sky is Falling, The Sky is Falling", playing up to the cameras for that shot at a pulitzer. What a bunch of hacks and whores. If you're going to tell our story, don't spin it, don't deconstruct it, just report events as things happen." Excellent point, and it calls it as it is. This is what needs to change, and will change as a result of what was done. Not fun for now, but because of the embeds, the blogs, and a more savvy public, it will change. Thanks for writing in, and the bottle is waiting! Ironbear, got it in one. Do expect to see a lot of assaults on the net and the blogs in the days and months ahead. Some will be direct, some will not, but the attacks will come. The good news is, that many of the more savvy or better media outlets are embracing blogdom and the net instead, and they are setting a standard and a challenge to the rest. Posted by: Laughing Wolf at August 5, 2003 12:15 PMI see the attacks on the Net coming, however there is still that pesky 1st Amendment thingy the PRESS would have to do away with. Grin. And I see a new meme rising up as well. For the first time in a long time, people are coming to the conclusion that the liberal left, both in the media and outside of it, are traitors. They are rooting for the enemy, for the destruction of this nation. And are willing to speak up and say it. Navaguesser is not the first, nor will he be the last. It has been floating around for a few weeks at least, the hue and cry about Ann Coulter's book is the first time I recognized it. That is going to be helpful. Of course, Hamas' endorsement for the Democrats is not unhelpful either. And Nav? If you find yourself in the bay area of California, the Jim Beam is on me. Posted by: Ben at August 5, 2003 12:42 PMYup. In a rather large nutshell. ;] RIAA and the DMCA are fueling several of the direct and indirect attacks, in the guise of "protecting" copyright - but only for corporate copyright holders who can afford the massive sue campaigns. [Not going to get into the rights/wrongs of web piracy. As a graphic artist,I have strong views on that which aren't always relevent to my position on RIAA] The nature of the 'net makes it a prereq for entities doing business on it to adapt to a new model, as you pointed out in your articles on journalism. It also affects punditry, advertising, commerce, politics... all entities. Adapt or die. Unfortunately, as evidenced by the dot.com boom/bust, it's a new model that a large number of traditional mediums have no clue of how to adapt to. That forms a large money block that will fall back on traditional means to try to limit the model: noteably, legislation. An inherent problem is that among all the other things the 'net is, it's pervasive. It's going to be difficult to control without destroying what makes it work, and effective control/destruction of the 'net can easily spell suicide in an information exchange dominated world. Not that might ever prevented anything from willfully self destructing through shortsightedness... Good blog, Wolf. This is one of a small handful that I reccomend in my forum.[We have a lot of Space buffs, and your space exploitation articles are excellent] Good to see you, Naviguesser. Hang in there. Posted by: Ironbear at August 5, 2003 10:43 PMComments are Closed. |
You're in an Individual Post!
If you're looking to go to the main blog page, just click on the blog banner above, or use this hyperlink:
Laughing Wolf Home How To Reach Us
Search
The Bard's Jar
Products
Recent Entries
· Book Review: Ghost
· St. Elizabeth: Part II Much Better · Well, I Am Stressed By St. Elizabeth's · Monday Must Reads · Blog Sabbath · A Delightful Bit Of Serendipity · Wish I Was There · Friday Wolf Blogging · Thank You · In Memoriam Archives by Date
November 2005
October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 Archives By Category
Aviation/Space (43)
Birthdays (4) Blogging (282) Books (13) Celtic (6) Communications (22) Cooking (95) Cuba (12) Doing Good (35) Education (6) Food For Thought (26) Freedom (1) General (468) Godsons (6) Humor (29) Intelligence (1) Iran (5) Iraq (58) Media (221) Media -- Saving Pvt. Journalism (10) Medical (2) Military (106) Music (1) News (79) Obituaries (49) Philosophy (98) Photography (24) Politics (203) Preparedness (34) Products (104) Propaganda (5) Quizes (9) Religion (13) Scouting (2) Space Commercialization (44) Spam (4) Staff (1) Sunday Recipe (4) Telemarketers (1) Terrorism (126) Way Of The Wolf (18) Weapons (27) Weather (34) Wine (24) Wolves (55) Writing (6) Blogs
Winds Of Change.NET Rachel Lucas LT SMASH Chaos Manor USS Clueless USS Clueless Essential Library The Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler Cold Fury Kim du Toit Mrs. du Toit Sgt. Strykers Daily Briefing Give War A Chance The CounterRevolutionary Right Thoughts Bill Whittle/Eject! Eject! Eject! James Lileks Opinion Journal Bite The Wax Tadpole InstaPundit.Com Between The Coasts Little Green Footballs Tiger: Raggin' & Rantin' Tobacco Road Fogey Sgt. Hook The Mind of Man Truth Laid Bear mtpolitics The Smallest Minority Andrew Sullivan The Volokh Conspiracy The Dead Parrot Society The Scoop One Fine Jay The Iowa Libertarain On The Third Hand Parkway Rest Stop IMAO Little Tiny Lies A Small Victory Abisnthe & Cookies Selective Boycotts
Here are some sites to aid in doing thoughtful and effective boycotts, and some suggested target
· Boycott French Products · Boycott Hollywood · Hollywood Halfwits · Vivendi Universal/Universial Studios/USA Networks/Sci-Fi Channel. Hey, they are a French company and killed Farscape. 'Nuff said. News
Support Your Local Wolf
Save Farscape
Art
Music
Weapons
|