September 15, 2003Commercial Space: Changing The ApproachOn Rocket Forge, Michael Mealing has an outstanding article that picks up on my two most recent space business posts and takes the idea behind them to the next level. In it, he outlines four steps that need to be taken by those serious in space commercialization. “True Believers” will scream a bit, but that is the subject of tomorrow’s post. The rest of us will take this as a great starting point, and move even further. The fact is that space enthusiasts, and I count myself as one, tend to get caught up in the goal, the technology. It is the means of getting there, the specific projects that catch our eye and become the focus. The problem is, that focus is shared by no one else. No one else truly cares about the neat things we can do with a specific technology. Let’s face it: the really neat technology that can only come into play once we are in space is only of interest to a very small group. That is the problem. Instead, it needs to be looked at from two distinct, but closely related, viewpoints. First, the customer. Second, the investor. The customer should be the driver. What does the customer want? What can you sell the customer that they don’t yet know that they want or need? Michael makes some very good cases for this, and of finding incremental products to sell. The latter ties into the second viewpoint that is crucial: the investor. The investor is looking for anything that helps guarantees a return on investment, and for ways to greatly increase that return. That means finding as many markets for each product and waste product as possible. Yep, I said waste product. What is one person’s trash is another’s treasure and that will hold true in space as well. For years, people have tried to get NASA to leave the external tanks in orbit so they can be used. They not only have processed metals and chambers, but several tons of unused liquid oxygen and liquid hydrogen on board. It actually costs NASA energy and money to dump them into the ocean, but for reasons (or lack thereof) known only to them, NASA has bitterly resisted doing so. A waste product, and a possible sale to another customer. What is clearly needed in most of the commercial space community, particularly in the space enthusiasts community, is a change of outlook, a change of approach. The focus needs to be less on the technology or really neat thing, and on how that technology or thing can make money. More on that later, maybe even tomorrow. -30- Posted by wolf1 at September 15, 2003 07:16 PM | TrackBackComments The 'tanks in orbit' problem, at least, seems easily solvable by the application of a bit of politics. A bill requiring that for anything that NASA has lifted off the earth's surface that can make it to orbit but NASA plans to burn by dropping into the atmosphere or otherwise getting rid of it shall be placed in orbit under private ownership if there is a buyer willing to take it and that the offer will be profitable to the government. If multiple buyers come forward, make it an auction. I can't imagine there aren't enough senators and representatives to pass this type of legislation that will provide a (probably small but who knows) positive cash flow element to a program that is largely a sinkhole for money. Posted by: TM Lutas at September 22, 2003 02:55 PMFWIIW, People have been trying for years to get that done, and no joy yet. May be worth a new try, once the X-Prize is won and congresscritters have an out through private companies no longer being dependent on NASA and Bomart. Posted by: Laughing Wolf at September 22, 2003 04:47 PMComments are Closed. |
You're in an Individual Post!
If you're looking to go to the main blog page, just click on the blog banner above, or use this hyperlink:
Laughing Wolf Home How To Reach Us
Search
The Bard's Jar
Products
Recent Entries
· A Toast Was Raised
· An Interesting Time At Quicklube · You Say It's Your Birthday · In Memory Of London · Good Thoughts Needed · Phone Cards Needed For Angels · Jan Bussey Interview Is Up · The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America · A Quick Thought · Into The Light: Jim Baen Archives by Date
July 2006
June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 Archives By Category
Aviation/Space (44)
Birthdays (8) Blogging (319) Books (16) Celtic (6) Communications (23) Cooking (98) Cuba (13) Doing Good (41) Education (6) Food For Thought (28) Freedom (3) General (509) Godsons (7) Humor (31) Intelligence (2) Iran (6) Iraq (58) Media (226) Media -- Saving Pvt. Journalism (10) Medical (2) Military (116) Music (4) News (79) Obituaries (57) Philosophy (98) Photography (24) Politics (212) Preparedness (34) Products (114) Propaganda (5) Quizes (10) Religion (14) Scouting (2) Space Commercialization (44) Spam (4) Staff (1) Sunday Recipe (4) Telemarketers (1) Terrorism (129) Way Of The Wolf (18) Weapons (29) Weather (37) Wine (24) Wolves (58) Writing (6) Blogs
Winds Of Change.NET Rachel Lucas LT SMASH Chaos Manor USS Clueless USS Clueless Essential Library The Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler Cold Fury Kim du Toit Mrs. du Toit Sgt. Strykers Daily Briefing Give War A Chance The CounterRevolutionary Right Thoughts Bill Whittle/Eject! Eject! Eject! James Lileks Opinion Journal Bite The Wax Tadpole InstaPundit.Com Between The Coasts Little Green Footballs Tiger: Raggin' & Rantin' Tobacco Road Fogey Sgt. Hook The Mind of Man Truth Laid Bear mtpolitics The Smallest Minority Andrew Sullivan The Volokh Conspiracy The Dead Parrot Society The Scoop One Fine Jay The Iowa Libertarain On The Third Hand Parkway Rest Stop IMAO Little Tiny Lies A Small Victory Abisnthe & Cookies Selective Boycotts
Here are some sites to aid in doing thoughtful and effective boycotts, and some suggested target
· Boycott French Products · Boycott Hollywood · Hollywood Halfwits · Vivendi Universal/Universial Studios/USA Networks/Sci-Fi Channel. Hey, they are a French company and killed Farscape. 'Nuff said. News
Support Your Local Wolf
Save Farscape
Art
Music
Weapons
|