June 29, 2004Sacrifice The Lives Of Soldiers And Innocents For PCI’ve known of this story for a few days now, but have held off posting for a number of reasons. Foremost, I could not believe that it was true, but it does seem to check out. Second, I had some trouble being able to discuss it in terms of rational discourse. Misha has the story here of Rep. Neil Abercrombie (D, Hawai’i ) who is telling the military that ammo manufactured in Israel can not and must not be used “under any circumstances” for anything other than target practice. The military bought the ammo because they were low on ammo and needed it. The shortage of domestic ammo is something that is well known and discussed elsewhere, and it exists because there is a shortage of people willing to make ammo domestically. There are a number of factors to this, but legal liability is indeed one of them. Since the quantity of ammunition needed was not available locally, we being at war and all, the military got it from a certified producer elsewhere, who just happened to be Israeli. Apparently, Rep. Abercrombie feels that these are some type of Jewish/Israeli super bullet, and that using them to fight terrorists of any stripe isn’t fair. Like gentlemen reading other gentlemen’s mail, it would not be proper to shoot a terrorist trying to kill innocents or our troops with such an evil thing. We have non-Jewish/Israeli ammo stored away, and should use it instead. I am having a hard time not savaging this bit of ignorant bigotry as it truly deserves, for it is ignorant and bigoted on several levels beyond the obvious. It is disgraceful, to say the least because when you parse it out, the following is the result: We are at war, a global war against terrorists and those that support them. In war, ammunition use is always higher than predicted. Ammunition stocks are low, and domestic production of same is limited and unable to meet demand. The purchase of ammunition from other sources is required. Restrictions on the use of “outside” ammunition is likely to impact the supply of ammunition reaching the front. When ammunition is unable to reach the front in sufficient quantities, combat operations are reduced or stopped. When ammunition is unable to reach the front in sufficient quantities, troops do not have the ammunition they need to do their duty, and to defend themselves and others. Both outcomes have a negative impact on the lives and safety of American citizens. Both outcomes have a negative impact on allies or others the United States has sworn to protect. Both outcomes have a negative impact on the war against terrorists, and offer the opportunity for potentially catastrophic results since the front lines could well be here at home, and not just in Afghanistan, Iraq, and elsewhere. “By no means, under any circumstances should a round [from Israel]be utilized” ties the hands of every soldier everywhere. It means that if the choice is between killing Taliban or being killed by the Taliban, then the soldier must die rather than shoot the enemy with an Israeli-manufactured bullet. It means that if the National Guardsman manning a security checkpoint for the 4th of July celebrations sees a terror attack starting, and has the chance to stop it by shooting, they may not do so if there is any chance that the bullets they have were made in Israel. What it means is that Rep. Abercrombie is more than willing that you or our soldiers die, in whatever numbers may be required, so that political correctness (and folly, ineptitude, etc.) shall reign supreme. After all, what are a few lives and innocent blood compared to such a noble cause and goal? Obviously, Rep. Abercrombie is most willing to sacrifice many things on the altar of political correctness. One wonders if he truly realizes what sacrifice he is ordering here? One wonders if he would have the courage and moral integrity to either conduct or make the sacrifice upon said alter that he is willing to order done in his name? Jen Martinez has some contact information here, and I would urge you to use it. I also am going to offer a challenge of sorts to all of you out there. This outrage offends me on so many levels and in so many ways, that I hereby offer to any candidate of any party running against Rep. Abercrombie – or any other member of Congress who supports this travesty – a free BlogAd for a week on this site. The only proviso being that you/they must not support this action, and work against it. If this offer is not legal under Federal law, talk to me about your campaign and I may just cover it, provided you oppose this travesty. I hope other bloggers will take up this challenge and make a similar offer. Remember, ultimately it is our safety that is at issue here. And I do not choose to sacrifice any life to such a diminutive deity as this congresscritter or the concept of political correctness. LW Posted by wolf1 at June 29, 2004 12:32 PM | TrackBackComments Well done. I've been rolling this whole situation around my mind also - in fact was hoping it was all just a sick joke. You're right about it being bigotry. And you're the first that called it that outright. (That I've seen anyways.) That is in it's basest form. What I've not seen anywhere (and it could be from lack of research time) is his reasoning. Does he explain himself beyond the simple "we must not"? Not that I'll agree with him, I just want to try and understand where he is coming from with this insanity. As best I can tell, it is because we would not want to offend Muslims by shooting at terrorists, Muslim or otherwise, with Jewish/Israeli ammunition. PC. Posted by: Laughing Wolf at June 29, 2004 01:49 PMOhhh, I didn't realize he actually thought that was a logical thought process. My Bad. Posted by: Tammi at June 29, 2004 02:28 PMNo, not your bad, his bad. His very bad... Posted by: Laughing Wolf at June 29, 2004 02:53 PMThis sorta reminds me of the "controversy" about laser dazzle weapons that ran through Photonics magazine about ten years ago. Various hand-wringers were horrified that lasers could cause _permanent_ eye damage, until they encountered a young Army captain at a trade show. "Hey, I don't want to blind anyone permanently, just long enough to run up and put a bayonet through his guts," he explained. When you're shooting at someone in a sincere effort to splatter his brains (or other organs) out, does it really matter whose initials are on the slug? As the old joke says, "To whom it may concern..." Posted by: Doug Jones at July 3, 2004 01:44 AMComments are Closed. |
You're in an Individual Post!
If you're looking to go to the main blog page, just click on the blog banner above, or use this hyperlink:
Laughing Wolf Home How To Reach Us
Search
The Bard's Jar
Products
Recent Entries
· Book Review: Ghost
· St. Elizabeth: Part II Much Better · Well, I Am Stressed By St. Elizabeth's · Monday Must Reads · Blog Sabbath · A Delightful Bit Of Serendipity · Wish I Was There · Friday Wolf Blogging · Thank You · In Memoriam Archives by Date
November 2005
October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 Archives By Category
Aviation/Space (43)
Birthdays (4) Blogging (282) Books (13) Celtic (6) Communications (22) Cooking (95) Cuba (12) Doing Good (35) Education (6) Food For Thought (26) Freedom (1) General (468) Godsons (6) Humor (29) Intelligence (1) Iran (5) Iraq (58) Media (221) Media -- Saving Pvt. Journalism (10) Medical (2) Military (106) Music (1) News (79) Obituaries (49) Philosophy (98) Photography (24) Politics (203) Preparedness (34) Products (104) Propaganda (5) Quizes (9) Religion (13) Scouting (2) Space Commercialization (44) Spam (4) Staff (1) Sunday Recipe (4) Telemarketers (1) Terrorism (126) Way Of The Wolf (18) Weapons (27) Weather (34) Wine (24) Wolves (55) Writing (6) Blogs
Winds Of Change.NET Rachel Lucas LT SMASH Chaos Manor USS Clueless USS Clueless Essential Library The Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler Cold Fury Kim du Toit Mrs. du Toit Sgt. Strykers Daily Briefing Give War A Chance The CounterRevolutionary Right Thoughts Bill Whittle/Eject! Eject! Eject! James Lileks Opinion Journal Bite The Wax Tadpole InstaPundit.Com Between The Coasts Little Green Footballs Tiger: Raggin' & Rantin' Tobacco Road Fogey Sgt. Hook The Mind of Man Truth Laid Bear mtpolitics The Smallest Minority Andrew Sullivan The Volokh Conspiracy The Dead Parrot Society The Scoop One Fine Jay The Iowa Libertarain On The Third Hand Parkway Rest Stop IMAO Little Tiny Lies A Small Victory Abisnthe & Cookies Selective Boycotts
Here are some sites to aid in doing thoughtful and effective boycotts, and some suggested target
· Boycott French Products · Boycott Hollywood · Hollywood Halfwits · Vivendi Universal/Universial Studios/USA Networks/Sci-Fi Channel. Hey, they are a French company and killed Farscape. 'Nuff said. News
Support Your Local Wolf
Save Farscape
Art
Music
Weapons
|