October 28, 2004

I Agree With The Ladies

Both Meryl Yourish and Kathy Kinsley do a good job of summing things up. I, too, disagree with W on many things but one thing trumps them all: the war on terror. Kerry is a liar and quite probably worse, and has demonstrated over the last 40 years that he is not fit for command of a rowboat, much less Commander In Chief in time of war. Blackfive brings up just a part of the why, the now why and not the Vietnam why, in his post. This post and those linked within raise even stronger concerns.

I do not want as President someone: who sees the war on terror and fantasy ideology as a law enforcement issue; who who will make action contingent upon external approval or veto; who will wait until we are attacked again to respond; and, most of all, who has clearly demonstrated that his response will likely be to cut and run or do something ineffective.

No, we need a strong leader who has the courage of his convictions and is not beholden to anyone other than the Amerrican people. That is why I will vote for Bush.

LW

Posted by wolf1 at October 28, 2004 01:50 PM | TrackBack
Comments

I already marked and mailed my ballot for Bush. Since I'm the daughter of a Vietnam Vet, Kerry lost my vote in 1971 (except maybe as the neighborhood pooper-scooper), so there was no soul-searching required on my part, even though I don't particularly like Bush. I'm more of a (small-L) libertarian than a conservative and that never seemed to fit with Bush. But I read this this today, and discovered that maybe he's a little better than I thought:
http://www.dhogberg.com/2004_10_24_dhogberg_archive.html#109899265483170745
And even if he's not... GWoT trumps all. Go Bush!

jan

Posted by: jlb at October 29, 2004 12:35 AM

Comments are Closed.