March 20, 2005

Product Review: Canon 20D

Life has had its ups-and-downs of late, and while mostly up, one thing very difficult was done. While I am not ready to discuss it yet, that event pushed me to do something nice for me. That nice was the purchase of a Canon 20D digital SLR. I have been wanting to get back into serious photography for a while and knew that digital was the way to go.

Yet, the purchase of the Canon was a major step in more than just price. All of my 35mm film work was done on Nikon, and I was a member of the Nikon Professional Society for a few years. Nikon was in my hands as I photographed the first Shuttle launches, covered stories ranging from plane crashes to dance recitals, and trekked into the wilds. My first digital camera(s) were Nikon, both at work and at home, and I have taken my CoolPix 990 literally around the world. I had thought that Nikon was pretty much untouchable in terms of lens and camera quality, but I was wrong.

The last couple of months have given me the chance to check out a number of systems and do some evaluation. When it comes to digital cameras, I have decided, the people to watch are Canon. The quality of the optics is top rate, and the lens technology superb. The cameras consistently beat the competition at almost every level, and the user interface, while daunting in complexity, is extremely user friendly. For those not interested in truly serious work, you can set the 20D to do auto everything and just snap away. Or, you can choose from 11 other major settings and do as much or as little as you like.

Right now, I am using it primarily in auto while I learn the camera and system. The results are very good:

Here is Ayla with a twinkie she found during the Easter Egg Hunt yesterday at Wolf Park. The image is degraded for the Web, but still shows the level of detail captured by the system. As for that pastry, it was not eaten but cached for later.

Here is a shot I took this morning of my Thanksgiving cactus, which has decided to bloom yet again. Apparently the move and changes in light/climate have it a tad bit confused.

Again, this is not a high-quality image shown, but one saved and trimmed for the Web. Yet, an impressive level of detail is still clearly visible.

So far, the largest drawback to the system is memory. During the events yesterday I shot enough images to almost fill a 1 Gb memory card. I foresee more cards and more external hard drives in my future.

I will keep you up to date on how things go with the camera, but so far it is safe to say that I am very pleased and impressed with the system. More as it develops...

LW

Posted by wolf1 at March 20, 2005 03:04 PM | TrackBack
Comments

Kewl! I found the body for $1300 at my usual camera place of purchase, so I might get one soon. I have the opportunity to participate in a workshop in downtown Seattle sometime in April, and I want to have it by then (and be somewhat familiar with it). Unfortunately, the date for the workshop hasn't been set yet so I don't know how little or much time I have.

Have you considered getting something like ExposureManager or PBase? That way you can put up larger versions for us to look at! I don't know about PBase, but ExposureManager is $40/year for unlimited storage and 5GB/month bandwidth, plus you can automatically watermark your stuff and prevent people from downloading images.

What sort of lens did you use for the zygo cactus? Unless it's cropped way down, it appears you can focus pretty close up. Us macro lovers like that!

>^..^<

Posted by: jlb at March 20, 2005 07:53 PM

I will look into that, and am also getting some coaching on how to put up better quality with lower file size too.

The lens is the EOS 17-85mm with built in macro, image stabilization, and auto focus. I did the shot to try the macro feature, and all I can say is wow. Did all the shots so far on that lens, have not used the 135mm portrait lens yet. Have a 100-400 IS lens on back order, can't wait for it to get here.

Posted by: Laughing Wolf at March 20, 2005 08:31 PM

Beautiful shots LW, just beautiful.

But then I've been a fan. Looking forward to what you share!

Posted by: Tammi at March 21, 2005 02:59 PM

Have you checked out the higher ISO settings to see how much noise there is? That's my pet peeve with my camera; ISO200 is almost unusable, and I can't even bear to look at anything taken at ISO400... but ISO50 and and 100 aren't enough sensitivity for even a bright cloudy day. And after 16,265 photos on the camera to date, even ISO50 is starting to show some noise. It's a constant annoyance for an extrememly visual person like myself.

Sigh. I sound like such a whiner, don't I? :0)

>^..^<

Posted by: jlb at March 22, 2005 02:14 AM

Comments are Closed.