January 11, 2006

Ceramic Brake Pads: Just Say No

I wanted to follow up on the discussions in this post (and note that Ken was right) and my promise in this post to tell how things went. In short, ceramic pads suck.

They did not work well in freezing wet, and were much harder on the rotors than any type pad I have ever before used. The rotors not only overheated, they warped and both they and the ceramic pads were pitted beyond belief. Instead of getting 100,000-plus miles out of the rotors, I will be lucky to make 100,000 miles. The pads (and rotors, really) did not last a full year. We are not amused.

I was lucky and found a chain place that was willing to turn all four rotors, replace the ceramic pads with semi-metallic, and do some other minor tweaking for less than $170.00. It will get me by until warmer weather less-lean times, when I will have to replace the rotors (all four, because if you do the front you had better do them all).

So, my experience is to just say no to ceramic pads.

LW

Posted by wolf1 at January 11, 2006 06:00 PM | TrackBack
Comments

Ceramic rotors are really best if you do a lot of hard driving, and don't want your wheels to get dirty. They aren't appropriate for "normal" driving, but they don't tell you that.

I change the brakes and rotors in the Exploder once a year. I turn the old rotors and put them on the shelf. I bought exactly one set of lifetime pads on the exploder, and every six months go to Autozone and get a new set. FOr free. They have learned to hate me. It costs me $0 to do a brake job, and takes me... well, the last time I did it, it took eleven minutes, all four wheels (with power tools, of course) Good that you found a shop that takes good care of you.

Posted by: og at January 20, 2006 05:25 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?